I do have to ask though, how do I turn data roaming off? It keeps using roaming data but I cannot find the option anywhere so I've turned data off altogether. Was this reply helpful? Yes No. Sorry this didn't help. Thanks for your feedback. I think the biggest commercial issue is that the most money in the phone business is made on app sales , and Symbian lost those once the Iphone came along and developers saw unlimited riches developing apps for IOS.
The fact that the vast majority of the apps in the Apple shop are useless trash, and most of the rest are so functionally crippled that one needs to buy several to do a single task, is not the point Symbian could easily be tarted up to work just like IOS.
But the app sales were lost for ever, as of about when most Symbian developers dropped it and worked IOS-only.
And a lot closed down completely. Android was lost to Nokia due to very limited options for product differentiation. So they had to do something else, and WP was the only option. WP is not a bad option. I have played with WP phones and they work fine. Piracy is IMHO barely relevant. It affects mostly games - just like on IOS where the vast majority of jailbreaking is done to run games and other trivia.
Piracy became big on Symbian once the developer community dropped it en-masse, and what the hell did they expect? Many developers didn't just drop development; they actually took the apps off their websites and out of the Nokia app shop, which is a really stupid business strategy.
This stupidity is what has driven piracy. I have had to google for a number of. Making the jump to Symbian Belle, it's pretty much the same experience but with no apps, though the core Belle experience feels more refined than Android.
It probably just came too late for Nokia I also think Nokia hasn't made a Smart Phone to get excited for until the Everything else they made was sub par, poor specs, poor screen and just very clunky and I'm guessing from reviews, Symbian wasn't good before Belle. Like I said though if they released the last year on Symbian Belle instead of Windows Phone 8, I think Symbian could have survived.
Really all Belle needed was the hardware and it just never got it, the is great for a camera but the hardware isn't mainstream like the is. I just find it weird how Nokia handled the whole situation, it took years for them to get going and once they did they retired Symbian and never released it on a relevant Smart Phone to give it a chance.
The has opened my eyes to Nokia Hardware though, it is good and well made. I'll wait to see if they release a refreshed with better specs and screen this year before I upgrade as I've just seen rumours about it. I'm just not convinced about Microsoft making good on Windows Phone, I don't like the experience it currently offers and Microsoft have never delivered on anything worth while in the past apart from Windows 7.
If I look at all their software, I don't remember any of it being good and now with Windows Phone being a closed experience, you're stuck with Microsoft's software. I just think it is a shame, I really like Belle, it just needs apps and Nokia to revive development for it. Samsung make about different HUGE phones. That outsourcing deal will close in , and is unlikely to be renewed. Nokia has been Symbian's biggest champion throughout its life and, when it said this month that last year's PureView will be the last Symbian device it ever makes, it was the final nail in the OS' coffin.
When the Accenture deal finally runs out, Symbian will be over 15 years old. Series 40 - Nokia's proprietary, budget OS — practically shares a birthday with Symbian; it too is around 15 years old. When you got your first phone, there's a good chance in ran Series 40, and for many people in developing economies, the same is still true. When it was clear that the iPhone and Android duopoly was having a significant impact on Nokia, it was thought that the low-end Series 40, not Symbian, would be axed and that Symbian would take over as Nokia's midrange and budget OS of choice.
It was not to be. As Dean Bubley, founder of mobile analysts Disruptive Analysis, wrote in : "There has been a certain amount of speculation that Nokia would push Symbian and S60 down further into the feature phone space, perhaps even getting rid of S That's clearly nonsense - S40 has to sell at price points right down to the bottom end of the GSM market, and up to some pretty decently-featured higher-end 3G devices.
Symbian won't scale down that low. Rumours surfaced again that Series 40 was for the chop last year, with Nokia working on a lightweight Linux OS called Meltemi, destined for mid-to-low range that Series 40 traditionally occupied. In the middle of last year, it was reported that Meltemi development work had been killed off as part of cost-cutting efforts at Nokia, and the company would be sticking with Series Meltemi, according to Reuters sources , was "to replace its Series 40 software in more advanced feature phones Meltemi would enable a more smartphone-like experience on those simpler models.
Today, Nokia is targeting three main consumer segments with Series 'first time buyers' — those buying phones for the first time, or phones with a particular feature set such as music or video for the first time; older users who've been with Nokia for some time and have decided they don't need or want a smartphone; and young, urban consumers, typically in emerging economies, who want to be able to access social content and services on their phones but are constrained by their budgets and their mobile networks.
A handful of months after Meltemi had met its end, Nokia began to count its touch-input Asha range, which run Series 40, as "smartphones". However, it's a nomenclature that most industry watchers would disagree with — Series 40 devices are more often considered feature phones, touch or no touch, as the OS doesn't run native apps a key facet of a smartphone , just web and Java apps.
It was only in mid that Nokia began to push Series 40 as a platform for apps, and mainly web apps at that. Apps for Series 40 come in two flavours, web and Java. In April , it introduced Nokia Web Tools — Eclipse-based tools which allow developers to create web apps for the Ovi browser — the proxy browser found on Series 40 phones.
The next year, it brought out the 2. And while Symbian failed to capitalise on its headstart in building an ecosystem, Series 40 doesn't seem to have suffered too badly from being late to the party. While download figures are low considering the platform shifts hundreds of millions of devices a year, momentum is growing.
Around 15 million Series 40 apps are downloaded a day, according to Nokia, and 42 percent of the last billion apps downloaded from the Nokia Store were for Series 40; a figure likely to rise considering the steep drop in Symbian shipments. It's a very, very major source of downloads of applications and content for us. It's something that very much we're interested and continuing to drive," Elop told analysts recently, adding: "We can offer [developers] an opportunity to make their applications visible and marketed to a very much larger customer base than virtually any ecosystem, so there is some strength there.
You would hope so — Series 40 remains a hugely popular OS. After reaching the milestone of 1. So, celebrating 1. What we want to say is — we are only half way to where we are going. After all, unlike the smartphone segment, there are still battles to be fought and won for Nokia in the mid and low-end.
We see the exact opposite. It's a very significant market size, not just today but in the years to come. Series 40 is an area that we're not just going to keep doing, but we're going to invest in more and more in the future," Saulo Passos, Nokia's head of communications for mobile phones, told ZDNet. But how long can Nokia keep the Series 40 gravy train going? Does it really have enough puff to find Nokia the next billion users?
The fact that, despite the homegrown threats of Symbian and Meltemi, as well as pressure from cheap Android phones, Series 40 has survived, implies that Nokia thinks so. I don't think we necessarily know the answer to that because, clearly, Nokia has been able to extract more from it than perhaps we would have expected a few years ago," Ovum's Cripps says.
If you could get under the surface of how Series 40 is being used on different Nokia phones, you'd probably find that's still the case. Or, to look at it another way, Series 40 is facing one of the key problems that befell Symbian. There may be room for Nokia to grow Series 40's user base for some time, but as Android devices get cheaper and other manufacturers become more willing to cut margins to win market share, Series 40 will face a growing challenge in the low end.
But when that consumer wants to move up the stack, where can they go if they stick with Nokia? There's still a gap in Nokia's portfolio between the highest-end Series 40 and the lowest-end Windows Phone — a gap that Android will be aching to fill. And if Nokia wants to compete on ecosystem, it might want to consider that Android brings , apps, compared to Series 40's 60, The Android challenge may be a way off for now in most of the areas where Series 40 is already popular or becoming so, however.
All this makes the spectacular fall of the Symbian OS an interesting study. We here try to pinpoint the causes that led to the ultimate demise of Symbian:.
Poor internet performance — Mobile web surfing is all about speed at least for most users , and Symbian fails miserably on this count. On handsets powered by this mobile platform, it became almost imperative for people to download a third-party browser app, to be able to access the web.
Even so, the internet speed was nowhere close to the sophisticated iOS or Android devices. Failure to gain advantage from being open-source — Open-source software applications generally get a headstart over competitors — but such was not the case with the Symbian OS.
In fact, when Symbian first came into being from Psion Software — it had hardly any competitors from the same market niche. When other players did start to arrive e. However, the fact that it took the OS as many as seven years to reach that mark also has to be taken into account. Compare the scenario with that in iTunes, where the app-count is already in excess of one million — and iPhone application development companies in India and overseas releasing many new apps every quarter — and you get the picture.
Developers started to hate Symbian — The intricate, often downright complex, ANSI and STL-based codes for Symbian were something the developers took pride in during the early s — but the love story soon turned sour. The extension for the Behemoth API was an absolute washout, and the system experts struggled to resolve even relatively simple handset problems.
Compared to Symbian, the Android and the iOS codes are way simpler. As the popularity of these handsets waned, so did the charms of the mobile operating platform.
0コメント